Falcon's Nest 2 subdivision

Described Osprey Hill as a safe, idyllic dead-end neighborhood and urged the commission to reject the plat or cut the northwest easement from 60 to 30 feet, saying a connector road would destroy the neighborhood's peace and safety.

A young Osprey Hill resident said the neighborhood is safe and peaceful and asked the commission to protect her home, formally opposing the easement as presented.

Questioned why 90 feet of combined easement width is needed if it's not meant for a road, and warned that connecting 50-plus future lots could add 100 vehicles a day past homes where grandchildren play.

Argued the West Corridor 'won't die,' questioned the need for a secondary access after 18 years, and urged the commission to preserve the quiet neighborhood rather than plan for a thoroughfare.

Spoke on agenda item 5 initially but addressed the Osprey Hill concerns about the Bluebird extension, neighborhood safety, and the repeated resurfacing of the West Corridor idea.

A 478 Bluebird Lane resident worried future development could put traffic from up to 64 homes on her street and asked the commission to keep only the footpath, citing safety for kids and seniors backing out of driveways.

Said 'we are not Cloud Peak,' supported the subdivision itself but opposed the large easement that could become a road to the West Corridor.

Said her family chose Osprey Hill because the plan showed only an emergency road, flagged the phrase 'at this time' as revealing road intentions, and warned a through road would hurt safety and property values like Sparrowhawk.

The HOA president gave a detailed opposition statement citing pediatric-trauma data on vehicle-pedestrian fatalities, property-value research, and formally requested conditions capping the easement at 30 feet for emergency access only.